Do liberals have worse mental health than conservatives? • Why Are We Like This?

The big picture

If you look strictly at self-reported surveys, the answer appears to be yes. For decades, political science and psychology research has documented a consistent “ideological happiness gap.” Across multiple datasets, conservatives report higher levels of life satisfaction and subjective well-being than liberals.^{1, 2} This gap persists even when researchers control for demographic factors that generally boost happiness, such as income, marriage rates, and religious participation.

However, a closer look at the data suggests this gap may be less about actual emotional experience and more about how different groups answer questions. When researchers analyze behavioral data rather than self-reports, the picture changes. Studies examining the emotional content of language in tweets or the genuineness of smiles in photographs find that the conservative advantage often disappears or even reverses.^{3, 4} Liberals tend to use more positive emotional language and display more intense genuine smiles. While conservatives evaluate their lives more positively in the abstract, they may not necessarily experience more joy in the moment.

The discrepancy likely stems from a combination of personality traits and worldview. Conservatives tend to score higher on conscientiousness and value upholding the status quo. This can offer a psychological buffer against anxiety regarding systemic problems.⁵ Liberals score higher on neuroticism and openness, traits associated with a sharper focus on societal inequities and a willingness to acknowledge distress. The “happiness gap” may be partly a “reporting gap,” driven by liberals’ willingness to admit dissatisfaction and conservatives’ tendency toward positive self-presentation.

Get all the details

The Survey Reality#

The evidence that conservatives say they are happier is robust. In the United States, this finding has been replicated consistently since the 1970s. In large-scale analyses of the General Social Survey, Republicans are significantly more likely than Democrats to rate their mental health as excellent.²

Researchers initially hypothesized that this was purely demographic. Conservatives are statistically more likely to be married, religious, and financially established. All three factors are strongly correlated with well-being. However, even after adjusting for these variables, a significant gap remains.¹ This suggests the difference is rooted in the psychology of the ideology itself, not just the lifestyles that tend to accompany it.

By the numbers

The magnitude of the gap is not trivial. In some analyses, the effect size of political ideology on life satisfaction rivals that of income or education. Recent work suggests that demographic and lifestyle factors (specifically the “social fabric” of marriage and religious community) do account for a substantial portion of the association, roughly 40-50%. They fail to eliminate it entirely, however.^{1, 6}

The Behavioral Paradox#

If conservatives are happier, we should expect to see signs of this in their behavior. Yet this is where the consensus breaks down. When psychologists analyzed data that is harder to fake than a survey response, the conservative advantage vanished.

Wojcik and colleagues ³ analyzed millions of tweets and the photographic records of members of Congress. They found that while conservatives reported higher happiness, liberals used more positive emotion words in their natural language. When analyzing photos for “Duchenne smiles” (genuine smiles involving the muscles around the eyes), liberal politicians displayed these expressions significantly more often and more intensely than their conservative counterparts.

This creates a paradox. Conservatives rate their lives better, but liberals seem to express more positive emotion in daily life. The discrepancy appears to reflect self-enhancement. Research suggests conservatives are more likely to engage in favorable self-presentation. They tend to view happiness and success as indicators of personal responsibility and moral fortitude. Admitting to unhappiness might be seen as a failure of character. For liberals, acknowledging sadness or anxiety may be viewed as an honest engagement with the world.³

Methods

Measuring the “Duchenne Smile”

To bypass the biases of self-reporting, researchers used the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). They analyzed official photos of members of the 113th U.S. Congress. Coders focused on “Action Unit 6” (the cheek raiser) and “Action Unit 12” (the lip corner puller). The combination of these two movements signals a genuine, involuntary smile (Duchenne), as opposed to a “social” or posed smile which typically involves only the mouth. The study found that Democratic politicians displayed significantly more intense Action Unit 6 activity than Republicans.³

Personality and the Burden of Insight#

The “Big Five” personality traits help explain why these groups process mental health differently. There is a well-established correlation between personality and political orientation. Liberals tend to score higher on Openness to Experience and, crucially, Neuroticism (sensitivity to negative emotion). Conservatives tend to score higher on Conscientiousness (order, duty, discipline).^{7, 8}

Neuroticism is, by definition, associated with lower reported happiness and higher anxiety. Because liberals are statistically more likely to possess this trait, they may simply be predisposed to feeling (or at least reporting) more negative emotion.

There is also a cognitive component. System Justification Theory posits that people have a psychological need to view the system they live in as fair and legitimate. Conservatives generally score higher on system justification. By believing that society is essentially meritocratic and fair, they are buffered against the dissonance and pain of perceiving systemic injustice.⁵

Liberals are often characterized by a “conflict monitoring” cognitive style that makes them more sensitive to contradictions and inequalities.⁹ This vigilance is necessary for identifying problems that need fixing. But it takes a toll on mental well-being. The lower life satisfaction reported by liberals may be the psychological cost of maintaining a critical stance toward the status quo.

The Gap in Clinical Diagnoses#

The distinction between “life satisfaction” (a cognitive evaluation) and “mood” (emotional experience) is important. Recent data reinforces that while conservatives report better “mental health” broadly defined, the gap shrinks or becomes more complex when looking at specific emotional states or diagnoses.²

Liberals are significantly more likely to report having been diagnosed with a mental health condition. This could be interpreted as liberals being “sicker.” But it is equally plausible that liberals are simply more culturally open to therapy and psychiatric diagnosis. If a conservative views resilience and self-reliance as core values, they may interpret symptoms of depression as a personal slump to be powered through rather than a medical condition requiring a label.²

The debate

Is it the ideology or the era?

Some researchers argue that the happiness gap is not a static psychological trait but a reaction to the political environment. Following the 2016 election, researchers observed a sharp spike in “vicarious rejection” and distress among liberals.¹⁰ This supports the idea that political events can acutely depress the well-being of the losing side.

However, longitudinal studies show the conservative advantage in life satisfaction has been relatively stable for decades, regardless of who is in the White House.¹ This suggests the gap is deeper than temporary political wins and losses.

So, do liberals have worse mental health? They are certainly more likely to say they do. They report lower life satisfaction and are more likely to claim a mental health diagnosis. However, this appears to be partly a function of a worldview that prioritizes critical awareness over system justification, and a personality profile that is less inhibited about expressing negative states. Conservatives, aided by the stabilizing structures of tradition, religion, and a belief in the fairness of the system, report higher satisfaction. But the behavioral evidence (the smiles, the words they use) suggests this advantage may be more about how they evaluate their lives in the abstract than how they feel on a Tuesday afternoon.

References#

References (10 cited sources)

1. Schlenker, B. R., Chambers, J. R., & Le, B. M. (2012). Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009 ↗

2. Schaffner, B. F., Hershewe, T., Kava, Z., & Strell, J. (2025). Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals?. PLOS ONE, 20(4), e0321573. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321573 ↗

3. Wojcik, S. P., Hovasapian, A., Graham, J., Motyl, M., & Ditto, P. H. (2015). Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness. Science, 347(6227), 1243-1246. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260817 ↗

4. Sylwester, K., & Purver, M. (2015). Twitter language use reflects psychological differences between Democrats and Republicans. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0137422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137422 ↗

5. Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 ↗

6. Talaifar, S., Jordan, D., Gosling, S. D., & Harari, G. M. (2025). Lifestyle polarization on a college campus: Do liberals and conservatives behave differently in everyday life?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(1), 152-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000545 ↗

7. Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807-840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x ↗

8. Fatke, M. (2017). Personality traits and political ideology: A first global assessment. Political Psychology, 38(5), 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12347 ↗

9. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1246-1247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1979 ↗

10. Claypool, H. M., Trujillo, A., Bernstein, M. J., & Young, S. (2020). Experiencing vicarious rejection in the wake of the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218798702 ↗

Additional Sources Consulted (70)

Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. W. (2018). Negative partisanship: why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39, 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479 ↗
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1482-1498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000605 ↗
Boston, J., & Homola, J. (n.d.). Personality Stability and Politics: TIPI Variability.
Boston, J., Homola, J., Sinclair, B., Torres, M., & Tucker, P. D. (2018). The dynamic relationship between personality stability and political attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82, 843-865. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy001 ↗
Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337 ↗
Braithwaite, V. (1998). The value balance model of political evaluations. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02682.x ↗
Buchinger, L., Entringer, T. M., Richter, D., Wagner, G. G., Gerstorf, D., & Bleidorn, W. (2024). Codevelopment of life goals and the big five personality traits across adulthood and old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(2), 346-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000477 ↗
Capara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20(1), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00141 ↗
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x ↗
Carlson, T. N., McClean, C. T., & Settle, J. E. (2019). Follow your heart: could psychophysiology be associated with political discussion network homogeneity?. Political Psychology, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12594 ↗
Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2016). Political chameleons: an exploration of conformity in political discussions. Political Behavior, 38(4), 817-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9335-y ↗
Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668 ↗
Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000005 ↗
Choma, B. L., Hanoch, Y., Hodson, G., & Gummerum, M. (2014). Risk propensity among liberals and conservatives: the effect of risk perception, expected benefits, and risk domain. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), 713-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613519682 ↗
Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?. Research & Politics, 2(4), 2053168015622072. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072 ↗
Cochrane, R., Billig, M., & Hogg, M. (1979). Politics and values in Britain: A test of Rokeach’s two-value model. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00320.x ↗
Conley, J. J. (1984). The hierarchy of consistency: A review and model of longitudinal findings on adult individual differences in intelligence, personality and self-opinion. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90133-8 ↗
Cooper, C. A., McCord, D. M., & Socha, A. (2010). Evaluating the College Sophomore Problem: The Case of Personality and Politics. The Journal of Psychology, 145(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.528074 ↗
Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2014). Political Intolerance, Right and Left. Political Psychology, 35(6), 841-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x ↗
Deboeck, P. R., Montpetit, M. A., Bergeman, C. S., & Boker, S. M. (2009). Using derivative estimates to describe intraindividual variability at multiple time scales. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016622 ↗
DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y., & Macy, M. (2015). Why do liberals drink lattes?. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1473-1511. https://doi.org/10.1086/681254 ↗
Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24(1), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00322 ↗
Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (n.d.). Stability of life-satisfaction over time.
Federico, C. M., & Ekstrom, P. D. (2018). The political self: how identity aligns preferences with epistemic needs. Psychological Science, 29(6), 901-913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617748679 ↗
Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D., & Hunt, C. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34(4), 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12006 ↗
Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055 ↗
Frimer, J. A., Brandt, M. J., Melton, Z., & Motyl, M. (2018). Extremists on the left and right use angry, negative language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0146167218809705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218809705 ↗
Garneau, C. R. H., & Schwadel, P. (2022). Examining the influence of political affiliation and orientation on political tolerance. Socius, 8, 23780231221132368. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221132368 ↗
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(01), 111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031 ↗
Goyanes, M., Domínguez-Díaz, A., & de-Marcos, L. (2025). Personality traits and political dispositions, ideology, and sentiment toward political leaders of 14 artificial intelligence large language models. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2025(1), 5761832. https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/5761832 ↗
Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573 ↗
Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. B. (2019). Ideology justifies morality: political beliefs predict moral foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12448 ↗
Hatemi, P. K., & Fazekas, Z. (2018). Narcissism and political orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12380 ↗
Hussey, I., & Hughes, S. (2020). Hidden invalidity among 15 commonly used measures in social and personality psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2515245919882903. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919882903 ↗
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611429024 ↗
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., Haidt, J., & Young, L. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366 ↗
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 ↗
Jost, J. T., Nam, H. H., Amodio, D. M., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Political Psychology, 35, 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12162 ↗
Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O., & Sterling, J. (2017). The politics of fear: is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation?. Social Cognition, 35(4), 324-353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324 ↗
Kim, K. R., Kang, J., & Yun, S. (2012). Moral intuitions and political orientation: similarities and differences between Korea and the United States. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.09.21.PR0.111.4.173-185 ↗
Kim, M., & Kim, C. (2017). “Predisposed” exposure: Exploring the personality basis for selective and cross-cutting exposure to partisan news media.
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 ↗
Koval, P., Sütterlin, S., & Kuppens, P. (2016). Emotional inertia is associated with lower well-being when controlling for differences in emotional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01997 ↗
Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions?. Social Justice Research, 27(4), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5 ↗
Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02016.x ↗
Luttig, M. D. (2018). The “Prejudiced Personality” and the Origins of Partisan Strength, Affective Polarization, and Partisan Sorting. Political Psychology, 39, 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12484 ↗
Luttig, M. D. (2017). Authoritarianism and Affective PolarizationA New View on the Origins of Partisan Extremism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(4), 866-895. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx023 ↗
Margolis, M. F. (2016). Cognitive Dissonance, Elections, and ReligionHow Partisanship and the Political Landscape Shape Religious Behaviors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(3), 717-740. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw023 ↗
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2024). How and why aversive personality is expressed in political preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(3), 664-683. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000498 ↗
Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049 ↗
Onraet, E., van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2013). Threat and Right-Wing attitudes: A Cross-National approach. Political Psychology, 34(5), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12014 ↗
Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K., & Pattyn, S. (2013). Internal and external threat in relationship with Right-Wing attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12011 ↗
Roche, M. J., & Jacobson, N. C. (2019). Elections have consequences for student mental health: an accidental daily diary study. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118767365 ↗
Satherley, N., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2021). Ideology before party: Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism temporally precede political party support. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12414 ↗
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x ↗
Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Hatemi, P. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12255 ↗
Song, H. (2017). Why do people (sometimes) become selective about news? The role of emotions and partisan differences in selective approach and avoidance. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1187755 ↗
Sparkman, D. J., Eidelman, S., & Till, D. F. (2019). Ingroup and outgroup interconnectedness predict and promote political ideology through empathy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1368430218819794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218819794 ↗
Sterling, J., Jost, J. T., & Hardin, C. D. (2019). Liberal and Conservative Representations of the Good Society: A (Social) Structural Topic Modeling Approach. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019846211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846211 ↗
Stone, S., Johnson, K. M., Beall, E., Meindl, P., Smith, B., & Graham, J. (2014). Political psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(4), 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1293 ↗
Sullivan, J. L., Marcus, G. E., Feldman, S., & Piereson, J. E. (1981). The sources of political tolerance: A multivariate analysis. The American Political Science Review, 75(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962161 ↗
Triki, A., Cassario, A., & Brandt, M. (2025). American liberals and conservatives (mostly) respond the same to party cues. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yd92v_v1 ↗
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Funchion, J. R., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2021). American Politics in Two Dimensions: Partisan and Ideological Identities versus Anti-Establishment Orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 877-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12616 ↗
Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00568.x ↗
Warren, C., Schneider, S., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2020). Motivated viewing: Selective exposure to political images when reasoning is not involved. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109704 ↗
Waytz, A., Iyer, R., Young, L., Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2019). Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12227-0 ↗
Weber, C. R., & Federico, C. M. (2013). Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences: Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences. Political Psychology, 34(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00922.x ↗
Webster, S. W., Connors, E. C., & Sinclair, B. (2020). The social consequences of political anger.
Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164 ↗
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000661 ↗